{"id":1595,"date":"2026-11-06T14:00:00","date_gmt":"2026-11-06T04:58:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/arvcalc.com\/blog\/?p=1595"},"modified":"2026-11-05T23:58:30","modified_gmt":"2026-11-06T04:58:30","slug":"state-of-rental-investing-2026","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/arvcalc.com\/blog\/state-of-rental-investing-2026\/","title":{"rendered":"State of Rental Investing 2026: 14 States Compared [Data Report]"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>We analyzed rental property data across 14 US states to answer one question: <strong>where does rental investing actually work in 2026?<\/strong> Not where influencers say to buy. Not where your cousin made money in 2019. Where the math works right now \u2014 with 7%+ mortgage rates, rising insurance costs, and property taxes that vary 300% from one state to another.<\/p>\n<p>This is the <strong>State of Rental Investing 2026<\/strong> report. All data sourced from Tax Foundation, Federal Reserve FRED, US Census Bureau, state REALTOR associations, Zillow Research, and RentCafe. Updated quarterly. Bookmark this page \u2014 we update it every quarter with fresh data.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/arvcalc.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/state-of-rental-investing-2026-annual-report.jpg\" alt=\"State of rental investing 2026 report 14 states compared rental property data cap rate tax insurance vacancy\" class=\"wp-image-1594\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\" srcset=\"https:\/\/arvcalc.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/state-of-rental-investing-2026-annual-report.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/arvcalc.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/state-of-rental-investing-2026-annual-report-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/arvcalc.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/state-of-rental-investing-2026-annual-report-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/arvcalc.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/state-of-rental-investing-2026-annual-report-768x512.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1536px) 100vw, 1536px\" \/><\/figure>\n<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_83 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"Toggle Table of Content\"><span class=\"ez-toc-js-icon-con\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/arvcalc.com\/blog\/state-of-rental-investing-2026\/#Key_Findings_Rental_Investing_in_2026\" >Key Findings: Rental Investing in 2026<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/arvcalc.com\/blog\/state-of-rental-investing-2026\/#The_14-State_Comparison_Full_Data_Table\" >The 14-State Comparison: Full Data Table<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/arvcalc.com\/blog\/state-of-rental-investing-2026\/#Cash_Flow_Rankings_Which_States_Actually_Work_at_725\" >Cash Flow Rankings: Which States Actually Work at 7.25%?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/arvcalc.com\/blog\/state-of-rental-investing-2026\/#Property_Tax_The_Hidden_Variable\" >Property Tax: The Hidden Variable<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/arvcalc.com\/blog\/state-of-rental-investing-2026\/#Insurance_The_Coastal_Penalty\" >Insurance: The Coastal Penalty<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/arvcalc.com\/blog\/state-of-rental-investing-2026\/#Population_Growth_The_Leading_Indicator\" >Population Growth: The Leading Indicator<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/arvcalc.com\/blog\/state-of-rental-investing-2026\/#The_Tax_Efficiency_Matrix\" >The Tax Efficiency Matrix<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-8\" href=\"https:\/\/arvcalc.com\/blog\/state-of-rental-investing-2026\/#The_Investor_Decision_Matrix\" >The Investor Decision Matrix<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-9\" href=\"https:\/\/arvcalc.com\/blog\/state-of-rental-investing-2026\/#High_Yield_Low_Growth_The_Cash_Cow_States\" >High Yield + Low Growth: The Cash Cow States<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-10\" href=\"https:\/\/arvcalc.com\/blog\/state-of-rental-investing-2026\/#Low_Yield_High_Growth_The_Appreciation_States\" >Low Yield + High Growth: The Appreciation States<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-11\" href=\"https:\/\/arvcalc.com\/blog\/state-of-rental-investing-2026\/#High_Yield_High_Growth_The_Sweet_Spot\" >High Yield + High Growth: The Sweet Spot<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-12\" href=\"https:\/\/arvcalc.com\/blog\/state-of-rental-investing-2026\/#Low_Yield_Low_Growth_The_Avoid_Zone\" >Low Yield + Low Growth: The Avoid Zone<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-13\" href=\"https:\/\/arvcalc.com\/blog\/state-of-rental-investing-2026\/#What_Changed_Since_2025\" >What Changed Since 2025<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-14\" href=\"https:\/\/arvcalc.com\/blog\/state-of-rental-investing-2026\/#Methodology\" >Methodology<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-15\" href=\"https:\/\/arvcalc.com\/blog\/state-of-rental-investing-2026\/#Run_Your_Own_Analysis\" >Run Your Own Analysis<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-16\" href=\"https:\/\/arvcalc.com\/blog\/state-of-rental-investing-2026\/#Frequently_Asked_Questions\" >Frequently Asked Questions<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-17\" href=\"https:\/\/arvcalc.com\/blog\/state-of-rental-investing-2026\/#Download_and_Share\" >Download and Share<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Key_Findings_Rental_Investing_in_2026\"><\/span>Key Findings: Rental Investing in 2026<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Only 5 of 14 states produce positive cash flow at 25% down and 7.25% rates.<\/strong> Indiana, Ohio, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Tennessee. The rest require larger down payments or creative financing to cash flow.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Property tax is the #1 cash flow killer<\/strong> \u2014 more than mortgage rates. Texas at 1.80% vs Colorado at 0.51% creates a $3,225\/year gap on a $250,000 property. That is $269\/month before you collect a dollar of rent.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Insurance costs doubled the gap between inland and coastal.<\/strong> Inland South Carolina: $1,500\/yr. Coastal Florida: $4,500\/yr. A $3,000\/year insurance gap eliminates cash flow on properties that look identical on a spreadsheet.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Population growth predicts rent growth 2-3 years ahead.<\/strong> States growing 1%+ annually (SC, TX, AZ, GA) see 3-5% annual rent increases. Stagnant states (MI, PA, OH) see 1-2%.<\/li>\n<li><strong>No-income-tax states (TX, TN, FL) save investors $2,000-$8,000\/year<\/strong> on a $50,000 NOI portfolio versus states like California (13.3%) or Virginia (5.75%).<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"The_14-State_Comparison_Full_Data_Table\"><\/span>The 14-State Comparison: Full Data Table<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\">\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>State<\/th>\n<th>Median Price<\/th>\n<th>Median Rent<\/th>\n<th>Gross Yield<\/th>\n<th>Prop Tax<\/th>\n<th>Income Tax<\/th>\n<th>Insurance<\/th>\n<th>Vacancy<\/th>\n<th>Pop Growth<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><strong><a href=\"\/states\/indiana\/\">Indiana<\/a><\/strong><\/td>\n<td>$185,000<\/td>\n<td>$1,150\/mo<\/td>\n<td class=\"text-green-600\"><strong>7.5%<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>0.85%<\/td>\n<td>3.23%<\/td>\n<td>$1,800<\/td>\n<td>5.5%<\/td>\n<td>+0.4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong><a href=\"\/states\/michigan\/\">Michigan<\/a><\/strong><\/td>\n<td>$235,000<\/td>\n<td>$1,300\/mo<\/td>\n<td class=\"text-green-600\"><strong>6.6%<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>1.54%<\/td>\n<td>4.25%<\/td>\n<td>$1,600<\/td>\n<td>5.8%<\/td>\n<td>+0.1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong><a href=\"\/states\/ohio\/\">Ohio<\/a><\/strong><\/td>\n<td>$235,000<\/td>\n<td>$1,250\/mo<\/td>\n<td class=\"text-green-600\"><strong>6.4%<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>1.36%<\/td>\n<td>0-3.99%<\/td>\n<td>$2,100<\/td>\n<td>6.5%<\/td>\n<td>+0.3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong><a href=\"\/states\/pennsylvania\/\">Pennsylvania<\/a><\/strong><\/td>\n<td>$260,000<\/td>\n<td>$1,350\/mo<\/td>\n<td class=\"text-green-600\"><strong>6.2%<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>1.58%<\/td>\n<td>3.07%<\/td>\n<td>$1,500<\/td>\n<td>6.5%<\/td>\n<td>+0.1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong><a href=\"\/states\/tennessee\/\">Tennessee<\/a><\/strong><\/td>\n<td>$280,000<\/td>\n<td>$1,450\/mo<\/td>\n<td class=\"text-green-600\"><strong>6.2%<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>0.56%<\/td>\n<td>0%<\/td>\n<td>$2,200<\/td>\n<td>6.5%<\/td>\n<td>+0.8%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong><a href=\"\/states\/south-carolina\/\">South Carolina<\/a><\/strong><\/td>\n<td>$280,000<\/td>\n<td>$1,400\/mo<\/td>\n<td><strong>6.0%<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>0.86%<\/td>\n<td>0-6.5%<\/td>\n<td>$2,200<\/td>\n<td>6.5%<\/td>\n<td>+1.7%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong><a href=\"\/states\/georgia\/\">Georgia<\/a><\/strong><\/td>\n<td>$355,000<\/td>\n<td>$1,600\/mo<\/td>\n<td><strong>5.4%<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>0.79%<\/td>\n<td>5.49%<\/td>\n<td>$2,100<\/td>\n<td>7.0%<\/td>\n<td>+1.3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong><a href=\"\/states\/virginia\/\">Virginia<\/a><\/strong><\/td>\n<td>$370,000<\/td>\n<td>$1,600\/mo<\/td>\n<td><strong>5.2%<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>0.82%<\/td>\n<td>5.75%<\/td>\n<td>$1,800<\/td>\n<td>5.5%<\/td>\n<td>+0.5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong><a href=\"\/states\/texas\/\">Texas<\/a><\/strong><\/td>\n<td>$335,000<\/td>\n<td>$1,450\/mo<\/td>\n<td><strong>5.2%<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>1.80%<\/td>\n<td>0%<\/td>\n<td>$3,300<\/td>\n<td>8.0%<\/td>\n<td>+1.7%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong><a href=\"\/states\/arizona\/\">Arizona<\/a><\/strong><\/td>\n<td>$400,000<\/td>\n<td>$1,700\/mo<\/td>\n<td><strong>5.1%<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>0.62%<\/td>\n<td>2.5%<\/td>\n<td>$2,000<\/td>\n<td>6.0%<\/td>\n<td>+1.6%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong><a href=\"\/states\/north-carolina\/\">North Carolina<\/a><\/strong><\/td>\n<td>$380,000<\/td>\n<td>$1,500\/mo<\/td>\n<td>4.7%<\/td>\n<td>0.66%<\/td>\n<td>4.5%<\/td>\n<td>$3,000<\/td>\n<td>6.0%<\/td>\n<td>+1.3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong><a href=\"\/states\/colorado\/\">Colorado<\/a><\/strong><\/td>\n<td>$500,000<\/td>\n<td>$1,900\/mo<\/td>\n<td>4.6%<\/td>\n<td>0.51%<\/td>\n<td>4.4%<\/td>\n<td>$2,800<\/td>\n<td>5.5%<\/td>\n<td>+0.8%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong><a href=\"\/states\/florida\/\">Florida<\/a><\/strong><\/td>\n<td>$410,000<\/td>\n<td>$1,900\/mo<\/td>\n<td>5.6%<\/td>\n<td>0.86%<\/td>\n<td>0%<\/td>\n<td>$3,800<\/td>\n<td>7.0%<\/td>\n<td>+1.4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong><a href=\"\/states\/california\/\">California<\/a><\/strong><\/td>\n<td>$650,000<\/td>\n<td>$2,300\/mo<\/td>\n<td>4.2%<\/td>\n<td>0.75%<\/td>\n<td>13.3%<\/td>\n<td>$2,400<\/td>\n<td>4.5%<\/td>\n<td>-0.3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/figure>\n<p><em>Sources: Tax Foundation (2026 property tax data), Federal Reserve FRED (vacancy rates), US Census Bureau (population estimates), Zillow Research and RentCafe (median prices and rents). Last updated: November 2026.<\/em><\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Cash_Flow_Rankings_Which_States_Actually_Work_at_725\"><\/span>Cash Flow Rankings: Which States Actually Work at 7.25%?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>We modeled a standard rental acquisition in each state: median-priced property, 25% down, 7.25% 30-year fixed, 8% management, state-specific tax\/insurance\/vacancy. Here is what cash flows and what does not:<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\">\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Rank<\/th>\n<th>State<\/th>\n<th>Monthly Cash Flow<\/th>\n<th>Cash-on-Cash<\/th>\n<th>DSCR<\/th>\n<th>Verdict<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>1<\/td>\n<td><strong>Indiana<\/strong><\/td>\n<td class=\"text-green-600\">+$195<\/td>\n<td>3.8%<\/td>\n<td>1.14<\/td>\n<td>Best cash flow in the US<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>2<\/td>\n<td><strong>Tennessee<\/strong><\/td>\n<td class=\"text-green-600\">+$155<\/td>\n<td>2.9%<\/td>\n<td>1.10<\/td>\n<td>No income tax + cash flow<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>3<\/td>\n<td><strong>Michigan<\/strong><\/td>\n<td class=\"text-green-600\">+$110<\/td>\n<td>2.2%<\/td>\n<td>1.07<\/td>\n<td>High taxes offset by low prices<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>4<\/td>\n<td><strong>Ohio<\/strong><\/td>\n<td class=\"text-green-600\">+$85<\/td>\n<td>1.7%<\/td>\n<td>1.05<\/td>\n<td>Cash flows but tight at current rates<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>5<\/td>\n<td><strong>Pennsylvania<\/strong><\/td>\n<td class=\"text-green-600\">+$45<\/td>\n<td>0.9%<\/td>\n<td>1.02<\/td>\n<td>Barely positive \u2014 needs good deal<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>6<\/td>\n<td>South Carolina<\/td>\n<td class=\"text-amber-600\">-$25<\/td>\n<td>-0.4%<\/td>\n<td>0.98<\/td>\n<td>Breakeven \u2014 growth play<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>7<\/td>\n<td>Florida<\/td>\n<td class=\"text-amber-600\">-$85<\/td>\n<td>-1.2%<\/td>\n<td>0.94<\/td>\n<td>Insurance kills cash flow<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>8<\/td>\n<td>Georgia<\/td>\n<td class=\"text-amber-600\">-$110<\/td>\n<td>-1.5%<\/td>\n<td>0.92<\/td>\n<td>Appreciation, not income<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>9<\/td>\n<td>Virginia<\/td>\n<td class=\"text-red-500\">-$180<\/td>\n<td>-2.3%<\/td>\n<td>0.87<\/td>\n<td>NoVA drives prices above fundamentals<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>10<\/td>\n<td>Texas<\/td>\n<td class=\"text-red-500\">-$210<\/td>\n<td>-2.8%<\/td>\n<td>0.85<\/td>\n<td>1.80% prop tax destroys cash flow<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>11<\/td>\n<td>Arizona<\/td>\n<td class=\"text-red-500\">-$220<\/td>\n<td>-2.6%<\/td>\n<td>0.84<\/td>\n<td>Prices outpaced rents<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>12<\/td>\n<td>North Carolina<\/td>\n<td class=\"text-red-500\">-$260<\/td>\n<td>-3.2%<\/td>\n<td>0.81<\/td>\n<td>Insurance + rising prices<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>13<\/td>\n<td>Colorado<\/td>\n<td class=\"text-red-500\">-$450<\/td>\n<td>-4.3%<\/td>\n<td>0.72<\/td>\n<td>Appreciation market only<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>14<\/td>\n<td>California<\/td>\n<td class=\"text-red-500\">-$890<\/td>\n<td>-6.5%<\/td>\n<td>0.55<\/td>\n<td>Impossible to cash flow<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/figure>\n<p>Run your own scenario in any state with the <a href=\"\/rental-property-calculator\">rental property calculator<\/a> \u2014 pre-loaded with state-specific defaults for all 14 states.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Property_Tax_The_Hidden_Variable\"><\/span>Property Tax: The Hidden Variable<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Property tax varies more than any other operating expense \u2014 from 0.51% (Colorado) to 1.80% (Texas). On the same $300,000 property:<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\">\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>State<\/th>\n<th>Tax Rate<\/th>\n<th>Annual Tax<\/th>\n<th>Monthly Impact<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Colorado<\/td>\n<td>0.51%<\/td>\n<td>$1,530<\/td>\n<td>$128<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Tennessee<\/td>\n<td>0.56%<\/td>\n<td>$1,680<\/td>\n<td>$140<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Arizona<\/td>\n<td>0.62%<\/td>\n<td>$1,860<\/td>\n<td>$155<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>North Carolina<\/td>\n<td>0.66%<\/td>\n<td>$1,980<\/td>\n<td>$165<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>California<\/td>\n<td>0.75%<\/td>\n<td>$2,250<\/td>\n<td>$188<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Georgia<\/td>\n<td>0.79%<\/td>\n<td>$2,370<\/td>\n<td>$198<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Virginia<\/td>\n<td>0.82%<\/td>\n<td>$2,460<\/td>\n<td>$205<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Indiana<\/td>\n<td>0.85%<\/td>\n<td>$2,550<\/td>\n<td>$213<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>South Carolina<\/td>\n<td>0.86%<\/td>\n<td>$2,580<\/td>\n<td>$215<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Florida<\/td>\n<td>0.86%<\/td>\n<td>$2,580<\/td>\n<td>$215<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Ohio<\/td>\n<td>1.36%<\/td>\n<td>$4,080<\/td>\n<td>$340<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Texas<\/td>\n<td>1.80%<\/td>\n<td>$5,400<\/td>\n<td>$450<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Michigan<\/td>\n<td>1.54%<\/td>\n<td>$4,620<\/td>\n<td>$385<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Pennsylvania<\/td>\n<td>1.58%<\/td>\n<td>$4,740<\/td>\n<td>$395<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/figure>\n<p>The spread between Colorado ($128\/mo) and Texas ($450\/mo) is <strong>$322\/month<\/strong> \u2014 $3,864\/year. That single line item can flip a deal from profitable to unprofitable. Compare tax impacts with our <a href=\"\/cap-rate-calculator\">cap rate calculator<\/a> and state-specific tools.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Insurance_The_Coastal_Penalty\"><\/span>Insurance: The Coastal Penalty<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Insurance costs split into two tiers: inland states ($1,500-$2,200\/year) and coastal\/hurricane states ($2,800-$4,500\/year). The gap is widening every year as reinsurance costs rise.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\">\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Tier<\/th>\n<th>States<\/th>\n<th>Avg Annual<\/th>\n<th>Monthly Impact<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td class=\"text-green-600\"><strong>Low ($1,500-$1,800)<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>PA, MI, IN, VA<\/td>\n<td>$1,675<\/td>\n<td>$140<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Moderate ($2,000-$2,200)<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>OH, GA, TN, AZ, SC (inland), CA<\/td>\n<td>$2,150<\/td>\n<td>$179<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td class=\"text-amber-600\"><strong>High ($2,800-$3,300)<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>CO, NC, TX, SC (coastal)<\/td>\n<td>$3,025<\/td>\n<td>$252<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td class=\"text-red-500\"><strong>Very High ($3,800-$4,500)<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>FL (coastal)<\/td>\n<td>$4,150<\/td>\n<td>$346<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/figure>\n<p>Florida&#8217;s insurance crisis is the single biggest shift in rental investing since 2020. Properties that cash flowed at $2,000\/year insurance now lose money at $4,500. Every Florida deal must be modeled with actual insurance quotes \u2014 not state averages. See our <a href=\"\/blog\/landlord-insurance-guide\/\">landlord insurance guide<\/a> and <a href=\"\/blog\/rental-property-insurance-cost-by-state\/\">insurance cost by state<\/a> for detailed breakdowns.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Population_Growth_The_Leading_Indicator\"><\/span>Population Growth: The Leading Indicator<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>States with population growth above 1% consistently see stronger rent growth 2-3 years later. The migration pattern in 2026 continues the post-2020 trend: movement from high-cost Northeast\/West Coast to Southeast and Sun Belt.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\">\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Growth Tier<\/th>\n<th>States<\/th>\n<th>Annual Growth<\/th>\n<th>Rent Growth (trailing)<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td class=\"text-green-600\"><strong>Fast (1.3%+)<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>SC, TX, AZ, FL, GA, NC<\/td>\n<td>1.3-1.7%<\/td>\n<td>3-5%\/yr<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Moderate (0.5-1.2%)<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>TN, CO<\/td>\n<td>0.8%<\/td>\n<td>2-3%\/yr<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td class=\"text-amber-600\"><strong>Slow (0-0.5%)<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>IN, OH, VA<\/td>\n<td>0.1-0.5%<\/td>\n<td>1-2%\/yr<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td class=\"text-red-500\"><strong>Declining<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>CA, MI (flat), PA (flat)<\/td>\n<td>-0.3 to 0.1%<\/td>\n<td>0-1%\/yr<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/figure>\n<p>The strategic tradeoff: fast-growth states (SC, TX, AZ) offer appreciation but lower current yields. Slow-growth states (IN, OH) offer higher current cash flow but limited appreciation. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.census.gov\/data\/tables\/time-series\/demo\/popest\/2020s-total-metro-statistical-areas.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Census Bureau population data<\/a> updated annually.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"The_Tax_Efficiency_Matrix\"><\/span>The Tax Efficiency Matrix<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>State income tax on rental income ranges from 0% to 13.3%. Combined with property tax, the total tax burden varies enormously:<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\">\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>State<\/th>\n<th>Income Tax<\/th>\n<th>Prop Tax<\/th>\n<th>Combined Tax on $50K NOI<\/th>\n<th>Tax Efficiency Rank<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td class=\"text-green-600\"><strong>Tennessee<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>0%<\/td>\n<td>0.56%<\/td>\n<td>$1,680<\/td>\n<td>#1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td class=\"text-green-600\"><strong>Texas<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>0%<\/td>\n<td>1.80%<\/td>\n<td>$5,400<\/td>\n<td>#2 (despite high prop tax)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td class=\"text-green-600\"><strong>Florida<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>0%<\/td>\n<td>0.86%<\/td>\n<td>$2,580<\/td>\n<td>#3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Arizona<\/td>\n<td>2.5%<\/td>\n<td>0.62%<\/td>\n<td>$3,110<\/td>\n<td>#4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Indiana<\/td>\n<td>3.23%<\/td>\n<td>0.85%<\/td>\n<td>$4,165<\/td>\n<td>#5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Pennsylvania<\/td>\n<td>3.07%<\/td>\n<td>1.58%<\/td>\n<td>$6,275<\/td>\n<td>#6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Ohio<\/td>\n<td>3.99%<\/td>\n<td>1.36%<\/td>\n<td>$6,075<\/td>\n<td>#7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Colorado<\/td>\n<td>4.4%<\/td>\n<td>0.51%<\/td>\n<td>$3,730<\/td>\n<td>#8<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Michigan<\/td>\n<td>4.25%<\/td>\n<td>1.54%<\/td>\n<td>$6,745<\/td>\n<td>#9<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Georgia<\/td>\n<td>5.49%<\/td>\n<td>0.79%<\/td>\n<td>$5,115<\/td>\n<td>#10<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Virginia<\/td>\n<td>5.75%<\/td>\n<td>0.82%<\/td>\n<td>$5,335<\/td>\n<td>#11<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>South Carolina<\/td>\n<td>6.5%<\/td>\n<td>0.86%<\/td>\n<td>$5,830<\/td>\n<td>#12<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>North Carolina<\/td>\n<td>4.5%<\/td>\n<td>0.66%<\/td>\n<td>$4,230<\/td>\n<td>#13<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td class=\"text-red-500\"><strong>California<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>13.3%<\/td>\n<td>0.75%<\/td>\n<td>$8,900<\/td>\n<td>#14<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/figure>\n<p><em>Combined tax = (income tax \u00d7 $50,000 NOI) + (property tax \u00d7 $300,000 property value). According to <a href=\"https:\/\/taxfoundation.org\/data\/all\/state\/state-income-tax-rates-2026\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Tax Foundation 2026 state income tax data<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"The_Investor_Decision_Matrix\"><\/span>The Investor Decision Matrix<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Every state falls into one of four quadrants based on two axes: current cash flow yield and future growth potential. Understanding which quadrant your target market occupies determines your strategy:<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"High_Yield_Low_Growth_The_Cash_Cow_States\"><\/span>High Yield + Low Growth: The Cash Cow States<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p><strong>Indiana, Ohio, Michigan, Pennsylvania.<\/strong> These states produce the highest current cash flow because prices are low relative to rents. The tradeoff: population growth is flat (0.1-0.4%), meaning rent growth will be modest (1-2% annually) and appreciation limited. Buy here for income \u2014 not equity. The ideal investor profile: someone who needs cash flow now, plans to hold long-term, and does not depend on appreciation for their return. Run deals in these markets through the <a href=\"\/rental-property-calculator\">rental property calculator<\/a> with the &#8220;Growth&#8221; tab set to 1-2% rent increase.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Low_Yield_High_Growth_The_Appreciation_States\"><\/span>Low Yield + High Growth: The Appreciation States<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p><strong>Arizona, North Carolina, Colorado, California.<\/strong> Prices outpace rents, making cash flow difficult at current rates. But population growth of 0.8-1.6% drives 3-5% annual rent increases and 4-6% appreciation. Buy here if you have a 7-10 year horizon and can absorb negative cash flow for the first 3-5 years. The math works on total return (appreciation + equity buildup + tax benefits) even when monthly cash flow is negative. These are markets where the <a href=\"\/real-estate-irr-calculator\">IRR calculator<\/a> matters more than the <a href=\"\/cap-rate-calculator\">cap rate calculator<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"High_Yield_High_Growth_The_Sweet_Spot\"><\/span>High Yield + High Growth: The Sweet Spot<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p><strong>Tennessee, South Carolina.<\/strong> The rarest combination \u2014 affordable prices, decent yields, AND strong population growth. Tennessee leads: 0% income tax, 0.56% property tax, 6.2% gross yield, and 0.8% population growth. South Carolina offers the fastest growth in our dataset (1.7%) with a 6.0% yield. Both states are landlord-friendly with fast eviction timelines. These are the two states where the fundamentals support both cash flow and appreciation simultaneously.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Low_Yield_Low_Growth_The_Avoid_Zone\"><\/span>Low Yield + Low Growth: The Avoid Zone<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p><strong>Virginia (outside NoVA), parts of Georgia suburbs.<\/strong> High prices driven by local demand that does not translate to rental yield, combined with moderate growth that does not compensate for the negative cash flow. These markets work for house hackers and owner-occupant investors \u2014 not for traditional rental investment at current rates.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"What_Changed_Since_2025\"><\/span>What Changed Since 2025<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Three shifts reshaped the rental investing landscape in the past 12 months:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Insurance repricing in Florida and coastal markets.<\/strong> Average Florida landlord insurance rose from $2,800\/year (2024) to $3,800\/year (2026) \u2014 a 36% increase in two years. Coastal South Carolina and North Carolina followed. This single factor moved Florida from a cash-flow-positive to cash-flow-negative state for many investors. The inland advantage (Midwest, Tennessee, inland SC) widened dramatically.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Mortgage rates stabilized at 7-7.5%.<\/strong> After two years of rate volatility, the market has accepted 7%+ as the new normal. This permanence is actually helpful for investors \u2014 you can now underwrite deals with confidence that rates will not spike another 200bps. The investors who waited for rate drops lost 18 months of rent collection and equity buildup. Rates are not the obstacle \u2014 deal selection and market choice determine returns at any rate environment.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Property tax reassessments hit in multiple states.<\/strong> Texas, Ohio, and Michigan all completed reassessment cycles that raised valuations 15-25% on investment properties purchased in 2021-2023. If you bought at the 2021 low and have not been reassessed yet, budget for a significant tax increase at your next cycle.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Methodology\"><\/span>Methodology<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>This report uses data from the following sources, cross-referenced and validated quarterly:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Property taxes:<\/strong> Tax Foundation effective rates (2026)<\/li>\n<li><strong>State income tax:<\/strong> Tax Foundation marginal rates (2026)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Median prices\/rents:<\/strong> Zillow Research ZHVI + RentCafe median rent data (Q3 2026)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Vacancy rates:<\/strong> Federal Reserve FRED + US Census Bureau CPS\/HVS (latest available)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Insurance:<\/strong> State insurance department filings + Insurance.com\/Bankrate surveys (2026)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Population growth:<\/strong> US Census Bureau annual population estimates (2025 release)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Cash flow modeling:<\/strong> ArvCalc rental property calculator with 25% down, 7.25% rate, 30yr fixed, 8% PM, state-specific defaults<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><em>Data is updated quarterly. Last update: November 2026. Next update: February 2027.<\/em><\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Run_Your_Own_Analysis\"><\/span>Run Your Own Analysis<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>This report shows state-level averages. Your deal is specific. Run any property through our state-specific calculators with local data pre-loaded:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"\/rental-property-calculator\">Rental Property Calculator<\/a> \u2014 full deal analysis with cash flow, ROI, and sensitivity<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"\/cap-rate-calculator\">Cap Rate Calculator<\/a> \u2014 compare cap rates across properties and markets<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"\/dscr-calculator\">DSCR Calculator<\/a> \u2014 check if your deal qualifies for investor financing<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"\/noi-calculator\">NOI Calculator<\/a> \u2014 calculate net operating income with detailed expenses<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"\/compare-deals\">Deal Comparison Tool<\/a> \u2014 compare multiple properties side by side<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>State-specific calculators: <a href=\"\/states\/ohio\/\">Ohio<\/a> \u00b7 <a href=\"\/states\/indiana\/\">Indiana<\/a> \u00b7 <a href=\"\/states\/tennessee\/\">Tennessee<\/a> \u00b7 <a href=\"\/states\/south-carolina\/\">South Carolina<\/a> \u00b7 <a href=\"\/states\/georgia\/\">Georgia<\/a> \u00b7 <a href=\"\/states\/texas\/\">Texas<\/a> \u00b7 <a href=\"\/states\/florida\/\">Florida<\/a> \u00b7 <a href=\"\/states\/arizona\/\">Arizona<\/a> \u00b7 <a href=\"\/states\/california\/\">California<\/a> \u00b7 <a href=\"\/states\/colorado\/\">Colorado<\/a> \u00b7 <a href=\"\/states\/pennsylvania\/\">Pennsylvania<\/a> \u00b7 <a href=\"\/states\/virginia\/\">Virginia<\/a> \u00b7 <a href=\"\/states\/michigan\/\">Michigan<\/a> \u00b7 <a href=\"\/states\/north-carolina\/\">North Carolina<\/a><\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Frequently_Asked_Questions\"><\/span>Frequently Asked Questions<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<details open>\n<summary><strong>What is the best state for rental property investing in 2026?<\/strong><\/summary>\n<p>For cash flow: Indiana (#1 with +$195\/month at median). For tax efficiency: Tennessee (0% income tax, 0.56% property tax). For growth + cash flow balance: South Carolina (1.7% population growth, 6.0% gross yield). For appreciation: Arizona (1.6% growth, low taxes). There is no single &#8220;best&#8221; \u2014 it depends on whether you prioritize current income or long-term growth.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<details>\n<summary><strong>Can you cash flow a rental property in 2026?<\/strong><\/summary>\n<p>Yes \u2014 in 5 of 14 states at 25% down and 7.25% rates: Indiana (+$195\/mo), Tennessee (+$155\/mo), Michigan (+$110\/mo), Ohio (+$85\/mo), and Pennsylvania (+$45\/mo). Other states require larger down payments (30-40%), below-market purchase prices, or BRRRR strategy to achieve positive cash flow at current rates.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<details>\n<summary><strong>Why does Texas not cash flow despite 0% income tax?<\/strong><\/summary>\n<p>Property tax. Texas charges 1.80% \u2014 the highest of all 14 states analyzed. On a $335,000 property, that is $6,030\/year ($503\/month) in property tax alone. The income tax savings of ~$2,500\/year are completely offset by the additional $3,870\/year in property tax versus a state like Tennessee (0.56%).<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<details>\n<summary><strong>How often is this data updated?<\/strong><\/summary>\n<p>Quarterly. We pull fresh data from Tax Foundation, Census Bureau, Zillow Research, and FRED every quarter. The cash flow models are re-run with current mortgage rates. Last update: November 2026. Next update: February 2027.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<details>\n<summary><strong>What mortgage rate was used for cash flow calculations?<\/strong><\/summary>\n<p>7.25% \u2014 the average investment property rate in November 2026. All models use 25% down, 30-year fixed, 8% property management, and state-specific property tax, insurance, and vacancy rates. You can adjust these assumptions in the rental property calculator.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<details>\n<summary><strong>Why is California ranked last?<\/strong><\/summary>\n<p>Price-to-rent ratio. California&#8217;s median price ($650,000) divided by annual rent ($27,600) equals a 23.6 ratio \u2014 meaning you pay $23.60 for every dollar of annual rent. Cash flow positive markets have ratios under 15. California also has the highest state income tax (13.3%) and population decline (-0.3%). It is an appreciation-only market that requires very specific strategies (house hacking, ADU conversion) to generate any positive return.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<details>\n<summary><strong>Can I cite this data in my blog or publication?<\/strong><\/summary>\n<p>Yes. This report is free to cite with attribution. Please link to this page (https:\/\/arvcalc.com\/blog\/state-of-rental-investing-2026\/) as the source. For press inquiries or custom data requests, contact us at the contact page.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Download_and_Share\"><\/span>Download and Share<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>This report is free to use, cite, and share. If you reference this data in your blog, article, podcast, or YouTube video, please link back to this page as the source. We update quarterly so your audience always has access to current data.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Citation format:<\/strong> &#8220;State of Rental Investing 2026 Report, ArvCalc.com. Data from Tax Foundation, US Census Bureau, Federal Reserve FRED, Zillow Research.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>We analyzed rental property data across 14 US states to answer one question: where does rental investing actually work in 2026? Not where influencers say to buy. Not where your&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1594,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1595","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-guides"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/arvcalc.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1595","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/arvcalc.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/arvcalc.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arvcalc.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arvcalc.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1595"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/arvcalc.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1595\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1596,"href":"https:\/\/arvcalc.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1595\/revisions\/1596"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arvcalc.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1594"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/arvcalc.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1595"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arvcalc.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1595"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arvcalc.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1595"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}